On Covering Tragedies

Donna Royer, a mother of two, was killed by her ex-husband.

The first time I reported on a tragedy, I was in college working for a student newscast.

I remember the story clearly because of the sadness I felt for the father involved.  I also remember it clearly because of the people I worked with in the college newsroom were disgusted with my decision to report on the story.

A father backing out of his driveway didn’t notice his toddler was in the way.  The little boy was killed.

I moved forward with the brief story, believing the tragic case would be a reminder for parents and babysitters.

As I wrote up the news script then, I remember receiving dirty looks and hearing the disgusted whispers of my fellow young reporters in the newsroom.

13 years later, as an uncle to two little girls, when I back out of my driveway, that story cycles through my head even before I jump in the car.

I’d like to hope someone who heard that story way back then still remembers too.

Tragedies in communities are often difficult to approach as reporters, because inevitably there will be backlash against the media when reporters start showing up with big news cameras.

Often people will give reporters like me tongue lashings and dirty looks for intruding.

I don’t blame them.

To some folks, reporters are just there to swoop in with their squads of news trucks to devour sound bites, and then move on without a care to the victims and to the people who are grieving.

We are responsible for our reputation in the field, and to be honest, some reporters out there are not so delicate with their approach to such stories.

I’m already surrounded by a cloud of distrust when I move onto a scene because of this perception.

And so was the case today involving the terrible story of Donna Royer.

My goal, in any tragedy, is to give our viewers perspective on what lead up to the event, and most importantly to humanize the innocent.

I moved on with door knocks, looking for such perspective from neighbors.   Often they have the best insight on what happened.

Today I found a nice neighbor who was willing to share perspective about Royer’s life with us.  She felt it was important.

It was an excellent perspective about a well respected woman who may have put up a brave façade for the sake of her children.

How human.

Royer feared for her life as she indicated in the restraining order I found.  She was afraid of her ex husband.   For some reason, she didn’t move forward with the restraining order.

There are thousands of other women in the Denver area who may silently identify with Royer.

Her death, while deeply tragic and horrible, brings to light the touchy subject of domestic violence—a subject that victims often don’t want to talk about or acknowledge out of fear of retaliation.

Later in the day, I was approached by a couple of people, including one man who shouted from his car window that our cameras were disrespectful.

Another teenage girl approached our live truck and said there was nothing new to the story and that we should stop covering it and just leave.

Some people on facebook today expressed disgust at the medias’ efforts to cover the story.  Some of these same people posted articles on their own profiles.

Often when I do receive tongue lashings and dirty looks out in the field, I can’t but help feel a little ashamed.

Maybe these people are right.

Maybe I am just some scumbag reporter looking to exploit someone’s death for a quick one-minute report.

But then all of that goes away when I remind myself the story behind a tragedy is more important than my own insecurities and obstacles.

What I’m dealing with is nothing compared to the heavy grief experienced by families who find themselves wrapped up in such horrible events.

While I can’t see the audience behind the lens, I believe someone out there is listening and learning, and thinking.

Maybe there’s another Donna Royer out there who is afraid to get help.

The two girls who lost their parents in all of this can use your support.   A fund has been set up.  Walk into any Wells Fargo and donate to “Donna Royer’s Children.”

About jeremyjojola
Husband - Journalist - Chocolate Cereal Addict

6 Responses to On Covering Tragedies

  1. gerridette says:

    Husban-Journalist-Compassionate-Chocolate Cereal Addict
    Thank you for doing the job, I was reminded to look before backing out because of a story like the one you wrote. I also was the woman who didn’t go through with the restraining order, because a policeman told me it won’t protect you it is after all only paper. I will remember.

  2. Oh Jeremy…. Don’t worry, people say and do things when they are in mourning but believe me… People do learn from real coverage. :) I know, I do… Keep it coming but always being respectful towards the surviving family…

  3. Kim says:

    Thank you for covering this story. If it helps just one woman get out of a domestic violence situation it is worth it. As a survivor of an abusive marriage, this story reminds me of how lucky I am to have gotten out. I appreciate the professionalism and compassion you have brought to covering this story

  4. TomH. says:

    Keep covering these kinds of stories, Jeremy. The people who yell at you or respond to your presence in a negative manner are emotional at that moment in time (as most of us are) and are needing to vent. You are the handiest target, that’s all. We in Albuquerque always appreciated your professionalism, and I have no doubt the wonderful folks in Denver do too.

  5. marcie says:

    Hi Jeremy:

    A good follow-up story would involve the following. 1) Was Mark bipolar or afflicted with a mental illness? 2) Why did he work in the psychiatry dept of ?UCD? ? Was he pursuing a degree? He was a minister so I assume he already had a seminary degree. (From New Mexico?) Did he have school loans? 3) What was his income and child support obligation? 4) Have his coworkers offered ideas on why he quit his job? No one in their right mind would quit a job like that, IMHO! Was he told to resign so his employer could give him a good recommendation? Was he expressing anger at work? Did his coworkers try to help him? 5) His house was in foreclosure – was this the marital house? Did he stop paying mortgage payments over a year ago – after his divorce decree? 6) Did he stop making payments because he had a child support obligation and/or he lost Donna’s income? 7) Did he even try to sell the house last year? 8) How often did he see his kids?

    I ask these questions because there were several male posters at DP who asserted Mark acted out of financial frustration resulting from “unfair” alimony and child support obligations. They did not know Mark but were imprinting themselves into the story. They had a a lot of anger. They also expressed anger at no fault laws. Lots of anger. So much that DP eventually erased their postings.

    However, Colorado’s child support and shared parenting discounts make child support much less than most states. Donna’s job sounded like it paid well and had benefits. She could very well have received nothing financially from Mark. She very well could have been paying Mark.

    Also, can you research a bit about the Royer ministry? What did it teach? (There were two churches in Hobbs.)

    Posters at DP, Huffington, and other media have asserted “She made him do it because she was crushing him financially because he had to pay child support and alimony!” or “He was an abuser who could not let go!” or “He was mentally ill and the stress of the divorce pushed him to do uncharacteristic things ” or “He was a biblical whacko!”

    It would be nice to have the facts in order to help others in the future.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.